Legal Opinion

Boekhoff v. Gruner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the it. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Eisher, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The record in this case is very imperfect. A number of docket entries, which were offered in evidence by the defendant in support of her plea of former recovery, are omitted therefrom. The brief of plaintiff’s, counsel assigns no specific errors, but is confined to stating some abstract propositions of law without showing their bearing on any ruling of the court upon' the trial. We gather, however, from the written argument that is presented to us on plaintiff’s behalf, that she complains on the grounds that the judgment is against the evidence, and that the court erred in embodying in its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gage v. GatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. State ex rel. Clifford v. BeldsmeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Baer v. PfaffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Brumback v. WeinsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Chicago Coffin Co. v. FritzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schafer v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Guinta v. Jack Daniels Distilling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API