Haberlin v. Peninsula Celebration Assn.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
After entry of judgment on verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $24,728, the trial court granted a motion for new trial on two grounds, insufficiency of the evidence and misconduct of the jury. Plaintiff appeals.
The question presented is—was there substantial evidence to support a contrary verdict?
Pacts
The action arose out of injuries received by plaintiff by being struck by a horse during a rodeo celebration at Redwood City, conducted by defendant, a nonprofit corporation comprised of business men and various community service organizations. The complaint charged defendant with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Danieley v. Goldmine Ski Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Garner v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Nicholas v. Tri-State Fair & Sales AssociationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Rufo v. N. B. C. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.