Legal Opinion

Haberlin v. Peninsula Celebration Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1957No. Civ. 17503PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

After entry of judgment on verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $24,728, the trial court granted a motion for new trial on two grounds, insufficiency of the evidence and misconduct of the jury. Plaintiff appeals.

The question presented is—was there substantial evidence to support a contrary verdict?

Pacts

The action arose out of injuries received by plaintiff by being struck by a horse during a rodeo celebration at Redwood City, conducted by defendant, a nonprofit corporation comprised of business men and various community service organizations. The complaint charged defendant with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Danieley v. Goldmine Ski Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Garner v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Nicholas v. Tri-State Fair & Sales AssociationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Rufo v. N. B. C. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API