Legal Opinion
United States v. Harold Oxman, United States of America v. William H. Pflaumer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 28, 1984No. 83-1531, 83-1532PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Harold Oxman and William H. Pflaumer appeal from sentences imposed following their convictions of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1982), and conspiracy to commit mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1982). Their convictions arise from a scheme to defraud the states of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and New Jersey of fuel excise and road use taxes properly due from a corporation, Wm. H.P., Inc. (WHP), owned by Pflaumer. The defendants contend that certain errors in the conduct of the trial and the government’s deliberate nondisclosure of evidence favorable to the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Millard BowieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Neil Saada and Isaac Saada, A/K/A ZuckieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.