Legal Opinion

Ludwig v. Gosline

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 31, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

191 N.J. Super. 188 (1983)

465 A.2d 946

CHARLES LUDWIG AND MARGARET LUDWIG, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

ANDREW J. GOSLINE AND MARY GOSLINE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted June 7, 1983.

Decided August 31, 1983.

Before Judges BOTTER, POLOW and BRODY.

Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & Bonello, attorneys for appellants (James M. McGovern, Jr., on the brief).

Steven C. Rubin, attorney for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, J.A.D.

This is a suit between neighbors occupying homes on adjacent properties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plaza v. FlakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Baker v. Normanoch Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Hazek v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Maddox v. HorneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Price v. EasthamAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Leach v. AnderlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. Hall v. Gregory A. Liebovich Living TrustCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  4. Thar v. Edwin N. Moran Revocable TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Thar v. Edwin N. Moran Revocable TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API