Legal Opinion

State v. Ekern

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] An attorney with the Pennington County Public Defender once again claims a sentence violates the constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment. 1 Here, the claim is that a two year penitentiary sentence for third offense felony DUI is constitutionally infirm. This suggestion “borders on the bizarre.” State v. Winchester, 438 N.W.2d 555, 556 (S.D. 1989).

[¶ 2.] Ekern is a chronic alcoholic and has been arrested over thirty times for drug and alcohol related offenses. She has eight lifetime DUI arrests, and, without counting the felony DUI in this ease, two felony DUIs in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BonnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. WinchesterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KORTH AND STEELESouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. EKRENSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. KORTH AND STEELESouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API