Legal Opinion

Marshall v. City of Gladstone

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 13, 1964No. 50341PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. If this court has jurisdiction of this appeal it is only because the petition properly and sufficiently alleges facts which present an issue involving the construction of the Constitution of the United States or this state within the meaning of Section 3, of Article V, Constitution of Missouri, V.A.M.S.

Plaintiffs allege that in 1959 they were assured by the “elected and appointed” officials of the City of Gladstone…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State v. LOUIS UNION TRUST CO.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Wrigley Properties, Inc. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Goodson v. City of FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Stribling v. JolleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hastings v. CoppageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Handshy v. Nolte Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Burk v. Missouri Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. State ex rel. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. YackelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API