Legal Opinion

McCartney v. Barg

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 3, 1986No. C 83-26PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WALINSKI, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss as well as plaintiff’s opposition thereto and several related responsive and supplemental pleadings. The action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Jurisdiction over the constitutional and federal statutory claims is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4). In addition plaintiff requests the Court to exercise pendent jurisdiction over the state claims raised.

I. Facts

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is a twenty-three year old woman who, because of her mental retardation,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. State of Tenn.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1990
  2. West v. MacHtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002
  3. Wilson Ex Rel. Wilson v. FormigoniDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. Schnatter v. 247 Group, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API