Legal Opinion

Miller-Rogaska, Inc. v. Bank One, Texas, N.A.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 6, 1996No. 05-95-00767-CVPublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITHAM, Justice (Retired).

This summary judgment appeal stems from events surrounding the payment of a check. Appellant Miller-Rogaska, Inc., as payee of the check, sued appellees Bank One, Texas, N.A. and Citibank Delaware, for conversion, negligence and gross negligence, money had and received, and breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court granted the banks’ motions for summary judgment on all claims. Miller appeals from the resulting take-nothing summary judgment in favor of the banks. We conclude that the trial court did not err in granting the banks’ motions for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Crim Truck & Tractor Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Hunt v. Baldwin, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. Eric Eisenberg v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  4. Swinehart v. Stubbeman, McRae, Sealy, Laughlin & Browder, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  5. Banca Cremi, S.A. v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API