Legal Opinion

Cushman v. Hussey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1916No. 9,365PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Gibson Circuit Court; Simon L. Vandeveer, Judge. Proceedings on the petition of Sardius Boger and others for an election on whether the sale of intoxicating liquor should be prohibited. On appeal of Joseph Hussey and another from an order of the board of county commissioners dismissing the petition, the circuit court rendered judgment directing the board to hold an election, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted. Motion by appellees to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.

Sardius Boger and 518 others, legal voters of the city of Princeton, Indiana, filed a peti*465tion as provided by statute, asking that an election be held to determine whether the sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage should be prohibited within the city of Princeton. After the filing of the petition, appellant, designating himself, as a remonstrator and taxpayer addressed a written motion to the petition asking that the same be dismissed for the reason that there was on file in the auditor’s office of Gibson County a remonstrance signed by more than a legal majority of the voters of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grusenmeyer v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Board of Commissioners v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Marshall v. MatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Dayton Gravel Road Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bell v. MaishIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cushman v. HusseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Indiana State Board of Dental Examinees v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API