CSX Transp., Inc. v. CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VINSON, District Judge.
Pending is the motion of defendant City of Pensacola for summary judgment, (doc. 9).
Except as noted, the following facts are undisputed in the record. Plaintiff CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSX”), a Virginia corporation, is a rail common carrier, with its principal place of business in Jacksonville, Florida. Pursuant to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act [49 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq.], CSX has published and filed Tariff CSXT 8100 with the Interstate Commerce Commission (“I.C.C.”). CSX’s filed tariff includes rates for demurrage. The City of Pensacola (“the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Everett v. NapperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Adam G. Nunez v. The Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. GrovesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- CSX Transportation Co. v. Novolog Bucks CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Illinois Central Railroad Company v. South Tec Development Warehouse, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- CSX Trans Co v. Novolog Bucks CtyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- IL Central RR Co v. R.R. Donnelley SonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003