Legal Opinion

In re Garnice

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1992No. SB-92-0029-D; Disc. Comm. Nos. 88-1567, 89-0009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This matter having come on for hearing before the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona, it having duly rendered its decision and no timely appeal having been filed,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. VICTOR A. GARNICE, a member of the State Bar of Arizona, is hereby censured for conduct in violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer, as disclosed in the Commission report attached hereto as Exhibit A.

2. Respondent shall pay to the State Bar of Arizona costs and expenses incurred in this matter in the sum of $2,759.63 with interest at the legal rate, within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matter of AckelArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Matter of ArrickArizona Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of HansenArizona Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API