Legal Opinion

Flores v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 20, 2011No. 4D10-1349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. The factual basis for the plea in this case did not establish actual possession of the firearm which is necessary for the three-year mandatory minimum to apply. Dawkins v. State, 923 So.2d 520 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); § 775.087(2)(a)l, Fla. Stat. (2001). The face of the record shows that appellant was in constructive, not actual, possession of the firearm. We reverse and remand for the trial court to strike the mandatory minimum term from the sentence imposed on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dawkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. IRVINE HICKS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Christopher J. Porter v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  3. RAMON J. ROSARIO v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API