Legal Opinion

Dawkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 2005No. 2D04-2969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

Artavis Dawkins challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to correct sentencing error. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Dawkins entered a negotiated plea to the offense of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and was advised by the trial court that he faced a three-year mandatory minimum term for possession of a firearm as a result. See § 775.087(2)(a)(l)(r), Fla. Stat. (2004). However, that mandatory term may not be imposed unless the defendant was in actual possession of the firearm at the time of the offense. See Washington v. State, 876 So.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Bundrage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Langley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MulusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Flores v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API