Legal Opinion

Matagorda County Hospital District v. Burwell

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 19, 2002No. 13-00-00271-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice HINOJOSA.

Appellant, Matagorda County Hospital District (“MCHD”), appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee, Christine Burwell (“Burwell”), in her suit for wrongful termination. By three points of error, MCHD contends: (1) the trial court’s exclusion of witnesses as a discovery sanction was harmful error, (2) the evidence is factually and legally insufficient to support the jury’s finding that MCHD’s personnel policy manual is an employment contract, and (3) the evidence conclusively established just cause for the termination of employment. We affirm.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matagorda County Hospital District v. BurwellTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cunningham v. Columbia/St. David's Healthcare System, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  3. Neely v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Arnold Ray Mangum v. Equistar Chemical Company, Velva Nurse, Frank Hastings and Mac Trejo, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Cherrie Cunningham, Individually and as Next Friend of Troy Conaster v. Columbia/St. David's Healthcare System, L.P. D/B/A South Austin Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API