Legal Opinion · Dissent

Central Hide & Rendering Co. of Wichita Falls v. Storey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 8, 1949No. 6456Published

1DissentHall, Chief Justice

After further consideration and study of the record and applicable authorities. I have reached the conclusion that our original opinion is incorrect and that appellees’ motion should be granted and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.

The statement of the nature of the cause of action in our original opinion is correct and I shall not add thereto. All issues of fact were found by the jury in favor of appellees. There is ample testimony in the record .to. sustain each finding by the jury.

Appellant, a private, enterprise, set up shop in the community adjacent to appel-*84lees’ homes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sumner v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Landwer v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Mid-Texas Petroleum Co. v. ColcordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Mann v. Trinity Farm Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Stark v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API