Riverside Insurance Co. of America v. McGlothin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
The question presented is, whether the insurance company, pleading an exception clause, has proved facts, in support of the exception, with such sufficiency as to entitle the insurance company to an • instructed verdict. The Lower Court answered the question in the negative and rendered judgment in favor of the insured, McGlothin (plaintiff below), against the insurer, Riverside Insurance Company (defendant below), for .$300.00 plus interest, penalty* and attorneys’ fees. Such judgment is challenged by this appeal.
Riverside 1 issued to McGlothin an insurance…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Life Cas. Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. BarefieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- United States Fire Insurance v. Universal Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
3Cited by11 opinions
- The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. William T. StoverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Ted T. Lynch and Ted H. Lynch v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. ColemanDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
- Morris v. Western Casualty and Surety CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Milwaukee Ins. Co. v. WadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.