Legal Opinion

Riverside Insurance Co. of America v. McGlothin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 29, 1960No. 5-2093PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

The question presented is, whether the insurance company, pleading an exception clause, has proved facts, in support of the exception, with such sufficiency as to entitle the insurance company to an • instructed verdict. The Lower Court answered the question in the negative and rendered judgment in favor of the insured, McGlothin (plaintiff below), against the insurer, Riverside Insurance Company (defendant below), for .$300.00 plus interest, penalty* and attorneys’ fees. Such judgment is challenged by this appeal.

Riverside 1 issued to McGlothin an insurance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Life Cas. Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. BarefieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. United States Fire Insurance v. Universal Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. William T. StoverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  2. Ted T. Lynch and Ted H. Lynch v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  3. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. ColemanDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
  4. Morris v. Western Casualty and Surety CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Milwaukee Ins. Co. v. WadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API