Brighton Athletic Club v. McAdoo
New York Supreme Court
Motions for injunctions pendente lite.
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
The plaintiffs move for an order continuing ■a temporary injunction granted on June 3, 1905, ex parte in these cases, restraining the police authorities in the borough of Brooklyn from interfering with them, and from preventing them from playing games of baseball at various points in the borough on Sunday. The argument of the motions which had been adjourned to Thursday last, June twenty-second, by consent of the parties, was then adjourned until to-day, Saturday, June twenty-fourth, against the objection of the corporation counsel, and because of the unavoidable absence of plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Weiss v. HerlihyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- In re RuppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- People v. PooleNew York Supreme Court · 1904
- Capital City Athletic Ass'n v. Police Comissioners of Village of GreenbushNew York Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Strand Amusement Co. v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- People ex rel. Hart v. DemerestNew York Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. EbbetsNew York Court of Special Session · 1917
- Southern Tier Baseball Ass'n v. Day, New York County Courts1910