Legal Opinion
Mutual Orange Distributors v. Agricultural Prorate Commission
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 23, 1940No. 564-JPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
In this proceeding certain lemon growers and shippers of the State of California seek to have the members of the Agricultural Prorate Commission of the State of California and its “Zone Agent” enjoined from putting into effect the California State Prorate Act (Chapter 754, p. 1969 Calif.Stats. of 1933) or putting into effect the orders or program in respect thereof. We are now concerned with the application for an interlocutory restraining order heretofore made'and submitted to a “Three Judge Court” as constituted under Section 266 of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Railroad Companies v. SchutteSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Wright v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Estate of SwansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- States v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942
- Mutual Orange Distributors v. Agricultural Prorate CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- National General Corp. v. Dutch Inns of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1974
- Laughlin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965