Legal Opinion
Ward v. Maritz Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 7, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 93-3935(CSF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion by defendants Maritz Inc. and Maritz Marketing Research Inc. (collectively “Maritz”), to compel the production of certain tape recordings and testimony and for sanctions. In addition to the moving papers submitted by Maritz, the Court has considered plaintiff Sally Ward’s opposition papers and defendants’ reply papers. Oral argument was held on July 5, 1994.
Background
On September 2,1993, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants alleging sexual harassment and constructive discharge from her employment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Louise Parrott, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Jeffrey Parrott, Deceased v. Max v. Wilson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Pete Rinaldi's Fast Foods, Inc. v. Great American Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson v. HaleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Milford Power Ltd. v. New England Power Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Walls v. International Paper Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Otto v. Box U.S.A. Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1997
- George v. Siemens Industrial Automation, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.