Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McCormick v. Maddy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1960No. 41,688Published

1Concurrence

“Parker, J.

(concurring): In the instant case the widow contends an ante-nuptial contract, which in effect fixes the distributive rights of the heirs of an intestate decedent when his estate is ready for final distribution, constitutes a demand against such estate provisions of the new Kansas probate code.

“This, as I read our decisions, is the first time this particular question has been squarely raised since the enactment of the new code. For that reason it is deserving of a forthright and definite answer.
“I am convinced the phrase ‘all demands’ as used in what is commonly known as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Foss v. WilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. Yeager v. YeagerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Brent v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. In Re Estate of JulianSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. In Re Estate of WaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API