Legal Opinion

McGowan v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue before us in tMs appeal is whether the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court) erred by finding that H. Steven McGowan (McGowan) was not a habitual offender under Section 1542 of the VeMcle Code1 because two of his three driving under the influence of alcohol offenses (DUI’s) arose from one single act of intoxication rather than separate acts.

The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT) appeals an order of the trial court that sustained McGowan’s appeal of a five-year revocation of his operating privileges. We reverse.

The facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frontini v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. FryeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Ross v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Fordham v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Hill v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deliman v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. S. Martini v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API