Legal Opinion
Alexander O & G, L.L.C. v. Nomad Land & Energy Res., L.L.C.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided May 9, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION H–16–2965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gray H. Miller, United States District Judge
Pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by counter-defendants Michael D. Jones ("Jones") and Jones Gill LLP (collectively, "Jones Gill"). Dkt. 32. Counter-plaintiff Nomad Land and Energy Resources L.L.C. ("Nomad") responded. Dkt. 52. Jones Gill replied. Dkt. 54. Nomad supplemented its response. Dkt. 58. Jones Gill supplemented its reply. Dkt. 61. Having considered the motion, response, reply, supplemental *797briefing, record evidence, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that Jones Gill's motion should be GRANTED.
I.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- International Energy Ventures Management, L.L.C. v. United Energy Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Meyer v. CatheyTexas Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olmos v. David B Giles PCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- South Avis Realty, Inc. v. NeeceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020