Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fisher v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2003No. 45A03-0207-PC-241Published

1Concurrence

Judge, RILEY,

concurring in result.

I concur in result. I do not disagree with the reasoning of Sharkey v. State, 672 N.E.2d 937 (Ind.Ct.App.1996) as the majority opinion sets out in footnote 3, but would distinguish its holding. I agree with the Conclusions of Law made by the post-conviction court who also distinguished Sharkey.

The verdiet in this case was entered on January 20, 1994. At that time, the court concluded that reckless homicide was a factually included offense of murder and followed the holding in Sills v. State, 463 N.E.2d 228 (Ind.1984), where the court held that the State could…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Roland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Outlaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Sharkey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API