Legal Opinion

Roland v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1986No. 484S122PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIVARNIK, Justice.

Defendant-Appellant Phillip Randall Roland was convicted of rape, a class B felony, at the conclusion of a jury trial in the Madison Cireuit Court. He was further adjudged to be an habitual offender. He was sentenced to eighteen and one-half (18) years, enhanced by thirty (80) years due to the habitual offender finding. The following issues are raised on direct appeal:

1. sufficiency of the evidence;

2. admission of various testimony and the form of cross-examination;

3. jury instructions;

4. admission of State's exhibits; and

5. sentencing.

I

Appellant maintains his conviction was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Clemons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Bish v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Tawney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Huffman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Underwood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Canaan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Stallings v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API