Legal Opinion

In re Davis

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1939No. 4122PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 8 to 11, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to a method of deodorizing cream.

Claims 8 and 11 are illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:

8. The method of deodorizing cream which comprises preheating cream to flash pasteurizing temperature, mixing with steam which is under twenty-five to fifty pounds pressure and permitting the steam and volatile gases to escape in an open chamber.

1…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Application of Charles Curtis SimmonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. In re HerthelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. In re GoldbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. In re GrinerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  5. In Re Arthur J. GrinerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API