Legal Opinion

In re Goldberg

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1948No. 5460PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 5 to 7 inclusive, 20, 21, 24 to 34 inclusive,, 38 to 40 inclusive, 50, and 51 for want of patentability over the prior art as follows:

Anderson, 1,069,995, August 12,1913.

Balcker, 1,401,388, December 27, 1921.

Leland, 1,979,479, November 6,1934.

Morgan, 2,017,805, October 22,1935.

Johnson, 2,111,784, March 22,1938.

Kingsbury, 2,114,389, April 19,1938.

Johnson, 2,133,170, October 11,1938.

Schwartz, 2,271,717, February 3,1942.

Six claims were allowed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re DavisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. In re GregoryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Application of Charles Curtis SimmonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. In re GrinerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. In Re Arthur J. GrinerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  4. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API