Legal Opinion

People v. Dukes

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1993No. Docket 131607PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a jury trial, defendant was found guilty of unarmed robbery. MCL 750.530; MSA 28.798. He subsequently pleaded guilty of being an habitual felony offender, MCL 769.10; MSA 28.1082, and was sentenced to a consecutive prison term of not less than 10 nor more than 22 V% years. In this appeal, brought as of right, defendant claims that the trial court imposed a consecutive term of imprisonment without statutory authority. We disagree and affirm.

The purpose of the consecutive sentencing statute is to deter persons convicted of one crime from committing other crimes by removing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WeatherfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. SheridanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SpannMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. YoungMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People of Michigan v. Victor PeeryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. People v. YoungMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API