Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Hughes

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1903No. 2208PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the District Court of Lake County.

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Thomson, J.

The defendants in error made application in the proper land office for a United States patent to the Populist lode mining claim. Within the period prescribed by law, the plaintiff in error, claiming title to the Prospect No. 1 lode mining claim, the surface boundaries of which embraced a portion of the territory covered by the location of the Populist claim, filed his adverse claim against the application, and in due time commenced this suit to try and determine the title to the ground in conflict. In his complaint he alleged the location of his claim upon a portion of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirk v. MeldrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  2. Fleming v. DalyColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butts v. SauveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Tonopah Ralston Mining Co. v. Mt. Oddie United Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Butts v. SauveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. McMillen v. Ferrum Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API