Legal Opinion

Slackman v. Kaufman

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion by Harry Slackman to punish Charles Kaufman for contempt of court. Punishment imposed.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The plaintiff moves to punish the defendant for a contempt of court. It is claimed that the defendant has violated an intermediate injunction order and also the judgment entered herein. Both in substance enjoined the defendant from carrying on the liquor business within a certain section, either directly or indirectly. The intermediate order enjoined the defendant pending the trial, and that, of course, was terminated by the judgment. The fact that the defendant violated that order is shown. Moreover, it is found in the decision of the court upon which the judgment was rendered. There it was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. The People Ex Rel. Negus v. . DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Moffat v. . HermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. People Ex Rel. Day v. . BergenNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Socialistic Co-Operative Publishing Ass'n v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Motion Picture Machine OperatorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. State ex rel. Eder v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Samuels v. GanzNew York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API