Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Lindner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1936No. Docket No. 81, Calendar No. 38,597PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I think the case presents testimony from which a jury could fairly find negligence, plus the wilfulness and wantonness required by the guest act (1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4648).

Two hours before the accident the parties turned off the main highway to a gravel road. It had been raining. The roadbed was soft and slippery. Shortly after turning off the main road they drove down a hill, at the bottom of which was a red lantern to mark a washout. Plaintiff called defendant Carl Lindner's attention to it. Shortly thereafter defendant approached a turn in the road at a speed of 30 to 35 miles per hour,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. WaltersWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Wieczorek v. MerskinMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Rogers v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Rinkevich v. CoelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Sherman v. DavidMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API