Legal Opinion
Kuck v. Berkey Photo, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 12, 1979No. 78 Civil 3788PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, alleging sex discrimination by Berkey Marketing Co., a division of Berkey Photo, Inc., instituted this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C., section 2000e-5, and the New York Executive Law, section 290, for declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief. In addition to presenting individual claims with respect to defendant’s employment practices, plaintiffs seek to represent a class of past, present, and future female employees of Berkey Marketing Co. who allegedly have been injured by defendant’s former…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Charles E. Wagner, for Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Reese H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman, Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Bynum v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Krueger v. New York Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Lenihan v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Reynolds v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.