Ridenour v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
Plaintiff is an employee of the United States Social Security Administration. On a number'of past occasions, plaintiff, acting pursuant to that agency’s “Employee Suggestion Program,” submitted proposals suggesting changes in administrative procedures relating to the processing of social security claims. Upon evaluation, the agency accepted these suggestions and, as authorized by the suggestion program, made cash awards to plaintiff, of varying amounts, measured against the estimated savings effected by the changes in procedure. The basis of plaintiffs complaint is that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Brighton Village Associates, Herbert F. Gold, Juan M. Cofield, James E. Cofield, Jr., Trustee, and Herbert F. Gold, Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cooley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Rinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Chambery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Carter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021