Legal Opinion

Chambery v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 9, 2002No. 01-203CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to United States Court of Federal Claims Rule (RCFC) 56. Plaintiff, Olive M. Chambery, contends the United States, acting though the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), breached its Regulatory Agreement with plaintiff by refusing to reimburse plaintiff for property maintenance expenses out of an established reserve fund and failed to give plaintiff the monies and interest deposited into that fund by plaintiff. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Brighton Village Associates, Herbert F. Gold, Juan M. Cofield, James E. Cofield, Jr., Trustee, and Herbert F. Gold, Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Michael G. Hurick v. The Honorable John Lehman, Secretary of the U.S. NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. Gadsden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. LivecchiDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  2. Aroeste v. The United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API