State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.M.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Chief Justice.
|,We granted this writ application to determine whether the charges against a juvenile must be dismissed where an adjudication hearing was not commenced within ninety days of an answer hearing pursuant to Article 877 of the Louisiana Children’s Code. The state argues the ninety-day period is suspended when it enters a nolle prosequi of the original charges and refiles the charges against the juvenile, since the ninety-day period begins to run only when the defendant answers the petition. We disagree.
For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the court of appeal ruling,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mundy v. OrnsbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- State v. RomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- State v. RichardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- State ex rel. J.B.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. HearinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Darvel Burgess v. Sewerage & Water Board of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
- State of Louisiana v. Terrence RobersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of A.C.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
- State of Louisiana in the Interest of R.M.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2018
- Darvel Burgess v. Sewerage & Water Board of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.