Legal Opinion

Hensley v. West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1998No. 25020PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Chief Justice:

The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources and the West Virginia Department of Administration/Division of Personnel (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Departments”), respondents below and appellants herein, appeal from an order entered September 16, 1997, by the Circuit Court of Cabell County. In this ruling, the court determined that the petitioners below and appellees herein, Mary Hensley and Sue Hatcher, former employees of the Department-of Health and Human Resources, were entitled to compound prejudgment interest at the rate of ten percent…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Otis v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Kucera v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Ewing v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Landals v. George A. Rolfes Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wickland v. American Travellers Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Michael Ray T.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Henderson v. Camden County Municipal Utility AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  5. Tri-State Petroleum Corp. v. Kevin P. CoyneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API