Legal Opinion

Odom v. State of South Carolina

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 28, 2025No. 8:23-cv-06895Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION Maurice Anthony Odom, ) also known as ) Maurice Anthony Odom, Sr., ) Civil Action No. 8:23-cv-06895-TMC ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ) v. ) ) Warden of Broad River Corr. Inst., ) ) Respondent. ) _________________________________) Petitioner Maurice Anthony Odom (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se, filed this Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2), D.S.C., this matter was referred to a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API