Legal Opinion

Serra v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error : Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, P. J.

Angelo Serra, plaintiff in error, was convicted of the crime of stealing an automobile.

A careful consideration of the record leads us to the conclusion that the judgment is not manifestly against the weight of the evidence, but, on the contrary, that the jury were justified in finding as they did.

*253As might be expected in a hotly contested case the record is not free from irregularities, but we have examined the errors referred to in argument and brief and find no prejudicial error.

The only alleged error that we deem it necessary to refer to is the claim that a new trial should have been…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hatheway v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. ChambersWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Durbin v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Hatheway v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API