Durbin v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFunk, J.
Plaintiff in error was indicted for embezzling the total sum of $2,000 between November 1, 1922, and December 6, 1924. The case was tried to a jury, and a general verdict of guilty was returned, the pertinent part of which reads: “Do find that the prisoner at the bar is guilty as charged in the indictment.”
The first error complained of is that the verdict of the jury is insufficient and contrary to law, because the jury failed to find the amount embezzled by defendant, as provided in Section 13691, General Code, which reads as follows:
“When an indictment charges an offense against property by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Serra v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1921
- Doe v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SudekatusOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
- State v. OilmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- in Re 8650 Frisco, LLC D/B/A Estilo Gaucho Brazilian Steakhouse, Mandona, LLC, Galovelho, LLC, Bahtche, LLC, Claudio Nunes and David Jeiel Rodrigues, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015