Legal Opinion

United States v. Jack Coppenger, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 7, 2015No. 13-3863PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Jack Coppenger, Jr., pled guilty to conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud. Pursuant to the parties’ plea agreement, the government agreed not to recommend a sentence in excess of the applicable advisory Guidelines range, which was 78 to 97 months’ imprisonment. Nonetheless, the district court used information in presentence reports prepared for Coppenger’s co-conspirators to vary upward and sentenced Coppenger to 120 months in prison. Coppenger contends the sentence is substantively and procedurally unreasonable. He asserts two claims of error: the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. VonnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United States v. Henry A. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Darryl JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Andre Hatcher, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Marcus FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Marquise FiguresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  5. United States v. Jason ZabelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API