Legal Opinion
United States v. Darryl Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 5, 2017No. 16-2415PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Rogers, J.,
GUY, J. (pp. 244-46), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Guns have the potential to make a bad situation worse. In light of that reality, the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”)., prescribe harsher penalties for defendants who have “used or possessed any. firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony offense.” U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). This case principally presents the question whether that sentencing enhancement applies to Defendant-Appellant Darryl Jackson, who made two pairs of separately negotiated…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- DePierre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Ronald Alan EnnengaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Gregory Lamont HardinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Lelynn Allen CovertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Michael Ray BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Karl AmersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Damon ShanklinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Alexander Sittenfeld aka P.G. SittenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Jeremy CruzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.