State v. McKinley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge
FACTS
Appellant McKinley was found guilty by a jury of receiving and concealing stolen property. He has filed a notice of appeal and a motion for release pending appeal.
DECISION
A motion for release pending appeal must first be presented to the trial court. Minn.R.Crim.P. 28.02, subd. 7(3). McKinley’s motion does not show he has made a motion for release in the trial court.
The trial court is in a far better position than an appellate court to determine whether a defendant is a risk to fail to appear following the conclusion of the appeal, or to commit a…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WittenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989