Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 3, 1931No. 1 Div. 678PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The trial was had on an indictment for rape; the jury found a verdict of guilty as Charged; and the punishment imposed was that “he suffer death by electrocution.”

No point is made upon the record proper; and it has been examined and found regular.

A motion for continuance for the issuance of an attachment for a witness, because of his absence, should disclose, among other things, the fact that the witness was available or within the jurisdiction of the court at the time of the trial; and it is held there was no error in the court’s refusal to delay the trial and issue an attachment for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knowles v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Gaines v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Kilpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Malloy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Gast v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Hull v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Weems v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API