Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mourar

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1950No. 1; Appeal, No. 121PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

This is an appeal by a defendant who, after trial by jury, was convicted of sodomy on an indictment which charged that he “did maliciously and feloniously solicit one George Schrum to commit sodomy with one John W. Yerger, and as a result of the said solicitation and the conveyance of the said George Schrum by the said ... Mourar to the home of John W. Yerger,... the said . . . Yerger did commit sodomy upon the said George Schrum . . .” According to the evidence, the defendant not only made all arrangements for the commission of the offense, but was actually present when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Commonwealth v. ParmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Commonwealth v. HabeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FINKELSTEINSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. DarnellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. FINKELSTEINSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Commonwealth v. FlowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API