Legal Opinion

Moulton v. Harris

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1892No. 14457PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Yuba County denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This action was brought to enforce the specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of land.

Under the findings, which are, as we think, supported by the evidence, it appears that the plaintiff, the vendee, took possession of the land, by her agents, with the consent of the vendor, and made valuable improvement thereon on the faith of the contract. This is sufficient part performance of the contract, it being oral, to take it out of the operation of the statute of frauds, under the rule announced in Calanchini v. Branstetter, 84 Cal. 258.

The most strenuous contention of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worn v. FryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Town of SebastopolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hambey v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Nicolds v. StorchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API