Azar v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SAMFORD, Judge.
Schedule 51, § 361, of the general revenue laws of the state, Acts 1919, pp. 282, 411, has been the subject of construction by this Court and the Supreme Court. Karthaus v. State, 19 Ala.App. 136, 95 So. 563; Braxton v. City of Selma, 16 Ala.App. 476, 79 So. 150; Jones v. State, 25 Ala.App. 410, 149 So. 855; Id., 227 Ala. 400, 149 So. 857; State v. Kartus (Ala.App.) 162 So. 538 1 ; Id., 230 Ala. 357, 162 So. 541. In the Jones Case, supra, Bricken, P. J., held the defendant not to be liable, and the Supreme Court on certiorari held to the conclusion reached by this court. In the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
- Braxton v. City of SelmaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Karthaus v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- R. E. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- State v. KartusAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Coastal Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- State v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Azar v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936