Legal Opinion

Azar v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1936No. 3 Div. 783PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

Schedule 51, § 361, of the general revenue laws of the state, Acts 1919, pp. 282, 411, has been the subject of construction by this Court and the Supreme Court. Karthaus v. State, 19 Ala.App. 136, 95 So. 563; Braxton v. City of Selma, 16 Ala.App. 476, 79 So. 150; Jones v. State, 25 Ala.App. 410, 149 So. 855; Id., 227 Ala. 400, 149 So. 857; State v. Kartus (Ala.App.) 162 So. 538 1 ; Id., 230 Ala. 357, 162 So. 541. In the Jones Case, supra, Bricken, P. J., held the defendant not to be liable, and the Supreme Court on certiorari held to the conclusion reached by this court. In the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Braxton v. City of SelmaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Karthaus v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. R. E. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. State v. KartusAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Coastal Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Azar v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API