Legal Opinion
MEJIA-ANDINO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3484PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 533
(BIA 2002) Interim Decision #3484 In re Rosa MEJIA-ANDINO, Respondent File A77 620 047 - Harlingen Decided December 4, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Removal proceedings against a minor under 14 years of age were properly terminated because service of the notice to appear failed to meet the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 103.5a(c)(2)(ii) (2002), as it was served only on a person identified as the respondent’s uncle, and no effort was made to serve the notice on the respondent’s parents, who apparently live…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Nobelda Cabrera, United States of America v. Leda CabreraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Pedro Bustos-Torres v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- PONCE-HERNANDEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- GOMEZ-GOMEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jose Flores-Chavez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Nolasco v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Llanos-Fernandez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- E-S-IBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2013
- B. R. v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.