Ingersoll v. Harrison
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGrates, C. J.
The plaintiff sued defendant by summons personally served, whereupon Sarah J. Harrison, appearing as defendant’s guardian, joined with him in pleading in abatement of the service that at the time of its occurrence he was under guardianship as an insane person. The plaintiff demurred, but the court sustained the plea and quashed both service and process.
The sole question raised is whether the existence of the guardianship took away the defendant’s legal capacity to be served with the summons, and we think it did not. He continued liable to suits and liable to notification of their institution.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crippen v. CulverNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Sternbergh v. SchoolcraftNew York Supreme Court · 1848
3Cited by5 opinions
- McKenna v. McArdleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Erwin v. FayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Hellebrand v. HoctorDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1963
- King v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Spence v. MinerNebraska Supreme Court · 1911