Legal Opinion

Sternbergh v. Schoolcraft

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1848PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This was a writ of error to the Sohoharie common pleas. On the 25th day of September, 1843, John Schoolcraft, Jun. recovered a judgment against Adam Sternbergh, before John Gebhard, jun. a justice of the peace, for $25,77, damages and costs.

Read the full summary

This was a writ of error to the Sohoharie common pleas. On the 25th day of September, 1843, John Schoolcraft, Jun. recovered a judgment against Adam Sternbergh, before John Gebhard, jun. a justice of the peace, for $25,77, damages and costs. The suit was by summons personally served, and the recovery was upon a promissory note signed by A. Sternbergh for $19,63 and interest, dated Dec. 14, 1839. In July, 1846, Schoolcraft commenced a suit on that judgment, against Sternbergh, before R. Gordon, a justice of the peace of Schoharie county. The cause was defended, and was tried by a jury. The…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Parker, J.

The rule is well settled that no matter of defence which existed anterior to the recovery of the judgment can be pleaded or shown as a defence to an action upon the judgment. (1 Chit. Pl. 485. McFarland v. Irwin, 8 John. 78. Green v. Ovington, 16 Id. 58. Griswold v. Stewart, 4 Cowen 458. Starbuck v. Murray, 5 Wend. 148. 1 Phil. Ev. 317.) The validity of the note on which the judgment before justice Gebhard was recovered, cannot, there-; fore, now be inquired into, if the justice had jurisdiction to render the judgment. And this question of jurisdiction is the only…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Starbuck v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Elder of First Baptist Church in Hartford v. WitherellNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. L'Amoureux v. CrosbyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. In re HopperNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  5. Faulkner v. M'ClureNew York Supreme Court · 1820

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Withrow v. SmithsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Speck v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Denni v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Heard v. SackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Ingersoll v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API