Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Prioleau
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUFF, J.:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company brought this declaratory judgment action to determine whether Paula Prioleau was entitled to underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage under her automobile insurance policy purchased from Nationwide. The trial court found no meaningful offer of UIM coverage had been made to Paula, and she was therefore entitled to have her policy reformed to include UIM coverage up to the limits of the policy. Nationwide appeals. We reverse.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 25, 1997, Julius Prioleau applied for automobile insurance with Nationwide. The application…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- WDW PROPERTIES v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Crystal Ice Co. of Cola. v. First Colonial Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CalcuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Bankers Trust of SC v. BruceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Messerly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Stringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Hodge v. Unihealth Post-Acute Care of Bamberg, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Lollis v. DuttonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Bouffard v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.