Legal Opinion
In Re Determination of Executive Commission on Ethical Standards
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 2, 1989Published
1Opinion of the Court
116 N.J. 216 (1989)
561 A.2d 542
IN RE DETERMINATION OF EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON ETHICAL STANDARDS RE: APPEARANCE OF RUTGERS ATTORNEYS BEFORE THE COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON BEHALF OF THE CIVIC LEAGUE, PLAINTIFFS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 27, 1989.
Decided August 2, 1989.
Frank Askin argued the cause for appellant Civic League of Greater New Brunswick (John Payne and Barbara Stark, attorneys; Arthur Kinoy, of counsel).
Lewis A. Scheindlin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Executive Commission on Ethical Standards (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- National Labor Relations Board v. Yeshiva UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.